Sinosauropteryx and other feathered dinosaurs
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6a6ef/6a6ef16f15d3e0286f98fb18bcdba27239f01c3d" alt=""
For years now, beautifully preserved fossil specimens of avian and non-avian dinosaurs (as well as many other animals and plants) have been coming from the rocks of the Early Cretaceous Jehol Group of northeastern China (photograph of Sinosauropteryx fossil from National Geographic, courtesy of the Institute of Fossil Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, Beijing). Many of the dinosaurs there appear to have been covered in a fine, filamentous, integumentary structures commonly referred to as "proto-feathers" or "dino-fuzz". These structures were predicted by paleontologists long before they were discovered, partly because of the many other anatomical features that extinct species of dinosaur share with living birds, and the phylogenetic relationship that they share. There are however, many people out there that, despite the overwhelming evidence in proof of the hypothesis, believe that modern birds are not the living descendants of maniraptoran dinosaurs. And they like to argue that dino-fuzz is not the precusor to "true" feathers, or an analogous structure. Instead, they say that the structures seen in the fossils are collagen fiber bundles that have deteriorated after decomposition, and only resemble a filamentous, downy feather. Others have suggested that they are simply the outlines of colonies of bacteria that formed as the body of the animals decayed. (For those paying attention, this is the part of the post that makes the title relevant, and rather clever.)
Luckily for proponents of the scientific method everywhere, Zhang (et al. 2010) and colleagues were able to prove once and for all, and repeat through testable hypothesis, that these structures are in fact feathers and feather-like filaments. And that was in part due to the presence of melanosomes in the structures. The melanosomes appear inside the structures (not outside like a bacterial film would), they are arranged in nearly identical patterns as melanosomes found in modern bird feathers (which would be quite a coincidence for bacteria), and they are found in the same parts of the fossils as you would expect to find them in modern birds (again, not an impossible coincidence, but the evidence seems a little stacked in favor of the not-bacteria hypothesis). So there you have it. Definitely feathers. Definitely in (non-avian) dinosaurs. But that's not all!
Because Zhang and his team are too legit to quit, they went one step further. They figured since they had melanosomes in fossil feathers, and they knew what melanosomes looked like in modern feathers, they could compare the two and determine (by shape, size, and other features) what colors were present in different melanosome varieties. For example, rod-shaped eumelanosomes and spherical phaeomelanosomes could be observed in the basil pygostylian bird Confuciusornis. And it can be reasonable inferred that because these types or melanosomes are packed with the dark colored pigment melanin, that Confuciusornis probably had some dark feathers on it's body. They did a similar analysis of Sinornithosaurus, a non-avian dinosaur, and determined it probably had feathers of varied colors across the surface of it's body.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9e678/9e6785877ab448cd0f6a17b0b086d4514bb96235" alt=""
So there you have it. One paper that changes the way we look at dinosaurs. Obviously the color thing is a huge deal, but more importantly, the research has shown that, beyond a reasonable doubt, dinosaurs did in fact have feathers and feather-like structures. This should put the debate to rest, once and for all. At least until more repeatable observations can be made that prove otherwise. Because that's how science works. You don't just make a claim and back it with a bit of patchy evidence. Your observations have to be subjected to cross-examination, and experiments have to be repeatable. That is what makes science great. You can't just say whatever you want and get away with it. The peer review process will get you in the end (sorry "Ida").
As always, thanks for reading. I know that for many, this story is old news. And to be perfectly honest, there is so much going on in the world of paleontology right now, it's been hard for me to keep up! But I'll try to keep the posts coming as regularly as I can for the dedicated few out there that want to learn more about science and life on Earth.
References
Zhang, F., Kearns, S. L., Orr, P. J., Benton, M. J., Zhou, Z., Johnson, D., Xu, X., Wang, X. 2010. Fossilized melanosomes and the colour of Cretaceous dinosaurs and birds. Nature 463: 1075-1078.
Looks questionable to me...
ReplyDelete